|
Post by monica on Dec 27, 2015 20:29:36 GMT
How did the anti-psychiatry movement influence the first feminist therapists?
The feminist psychologists were critical of historical research as having been done from primarily a male perspective, assuming that the male was the 'norm'. Many psychoanalytic concepts were considered by feminist therapists to be sexist and culturally-bound The anti-psychiatry movement argued that the treatment offered in psychoanalysis, and the asylums, only contributed to psychiatric illnesses rather than curing them, and considers psychiatry a coercive instrument of oppression due to an unequal power relationship between doctor and patient. it also involved a highly subjective diagnostic process. Feminist therapists understood this position from their own perspective, in an age where women could be seen to be mentally ill if they didn't follow the expected norms of society, so to that extent they were in agreement with a lot of what the anti-psychiatry movement thought.
That said, the anti-psychiatry still had a strong male-as-all-powerful-therapist approach, which encouraged the feminist therapy movement away and to focus on re-valuing feminine characteristics and perspectives.
|
|
|
Post by eccentric on Dec 30, 2015 6:20:32 GMT
Psychoanalytic feminists wanted to alter the experiences of early childhood and family relations, as well as linguistic patterns, that produce and reinforce masculinity and femininity They were critical of women being seen as as biologically, psychically, and morally inferior to men, their objective was to address political and social factors affecting the development of male and female subjects. Feminist therapy like anti psychiatry was a reaction to the many abominations that were administered to patients such as lobotomy and electro convulsive therapy not to mention over prescription of drugs, by mains stream psychiatry. As Monica says anti-psychiatry still had a male as all powerful approach and the feminist therapists aimed to divert from the male perspective.
|
|
|
Post by charlotte21 on Jan 3, 2016 18:23:11 GMT
It is interesting reading around this subject. As from what I am seeing the anti-psychiatry movement was a loose social and political movement in the 60's and 70's. However feminist psychology and therapy is considered to be much earlier, following feminism which became an acknowledged term in Great Britain in 1890. The late 1800's it seemed many women's rights groups and individuals criticized and opposed paychiatry, and asylums in particular. It seems incredible reading the literature that it took 70+ years for anti-psychiatry to be formally accepted as a political movement!
So, in reading this I am wondering if it could be argued that in fact it was feminism and feminist therapy that influenced and instigated the wave of anti-psychiatry, more than the other way around?
|
|
|
Post by charlotte21 on Jan 3, 2016 18:36:16 GMT
Of course which ever way around you look at the situation, I agree with my colleagues. The accepted societal norms had created a 'straight-jacket' in which it demanded women live. Oppression and repression from this societal 'straight-jacket' was only ever going to create unrealistic expectations on women - inducing increased internal pressure of the psyche for anyone who did not easily fit within those bounds (imagining a version of Boyle's Law for the psyche happening here!). Feminist therapists could obviously relate their perspective directly to the dominant issues of the anti-psychiatry movement, as previously detailed above.
|
|